Comments on: A Short Course in Digital Photography

By: Fishychips

Fishychips — Mon, 10 May 2010 16:56:14 +0000

I first came upon this book at my local library. Having perused the insides, I decided to get my own copy. Clear and concise, tons of visuals and clarification for some of us no-brainers who relate to graphics and diagrams over pages of mind-boggling dry text. This is basically a text book I guess, the reason for the high price. Anything to improve my art, hence, well worth the expense, and I do love my photography. I have a half dozen digital photography books on my shelf, but this will be my go-to book. Overall, an excellent first guide for digital photographers.
Rating: 5 / 5

By: D. V. Overturf

D. V. Overturf — Mon, 10 May 2010 14:42:02 +0000

The London-Stone book A Short Course in Digital Photography is an excellent example of a seriously refined book for the beginning photographer. In an age when so many photography books attempt to avoid obvious and critical links to analog photography precedents, the authors safely navigate the student from the crucial examples of the past into contemporary practice. The references to traditional photography, or whatever one may wish to call film, are valuable for students of any age and any background. Also, by introducing Lightroom and Aperture, but not trying the impossible task to cover them completely, the authors encourage further research into more advanced program guides. Indeed, this is an excellent all-around short course book.
Rating: 5 / 5

By: Daniel J. Cobb

Daniel J. Cobb — Mon, 10 May 2010 14:31:22 +0000

I bought this book because it was recommended for a class I am taking. I don’t know why a book like this was recommended to experienced photographers. If you’re new to DSLR and have a need to learn the basics including aperture, shutter speed, exposure than this book is for you but for any photographer with at least a basic knowledge of DSLR photography this book is a waste of time.
Rating: 2 / 5